Sentaro vs Sintra affiliate programs
Sentaro and Sintra are AI agents tools that both run affiliate programs. Sentaro lists no public rate; Sintra lists 30% new sale + 15% recurring renewals through Impact.com. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Sentaro Verified | Sintra Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not stated | 30% new sale + 15% recurring renewals |
| Structure | One-time | Hybrid |
| Cookie window | Not stated | 30 days |
| Network | Not stated | Impact.com |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | $10 USD |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-22 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Payout structure differs: one-time against hybrid.
In common
- Both are AI agents tools.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Sentaro does not publish a commission rate.
- Sentaro does not publish a cookie window.
- Sentaro does not publish a payout threshold.
- Sentaro does not publish the platform running the program.
How to read these two records
One of the two does not publish a commission figure, so the payouts cannot be set against each other.
Sentaro pays one-time commission and Sintra pays hybrid, which typically matters more than the headline rate over a customer's lifetime. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Sentaro and Sintra. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.