Revid vs Zebracat affiliate programs
Revid and Zebracat are AI video tools that both run affiliate programs. Revid lists 20% lifetime through Rewardful; Zebracat lists 30% lifetime through Rewardful. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Revid Verified | Zebracat Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 20% lifetime | 30% lifetime |
| Structure | Recurring | Recurring |
| Cookie window | Not stated | 60 days |
| Network | Rewardful | Rewardful |
| Payout threshold | $100 | $50 |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-22 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Zebracat pays out at a lower balance: $50 against $100.
In common
- Both are AI video tools.
- Both pay recurring commission.
- Both run on Rewardful, so one dashboard covers them.
Which record fits which promoter
- Revid: holds commissions until $100, which suits promoters expecting larger, less frequent payouts.
- Zebracat: reaches a first payout sooner — its minimum starts at $50.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Revid does not publish a cookie window.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Both pay recurring commission. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Revid and Zebracat. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.