MedReception AI vs TinyFish affiliate programs
MedReception AI and TinyFish are AI agents tools that both run affiliate programs. MedReception AI lists $150 per qualified demo + $300 per activated subscription (up to $450 per client); TinyFish lists no public rate through Direct. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | MedReception AI Verified | TinyFish Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | $150 per qualified demo + $300 per activated subscription (up to $450 per client) | Not stated |
| Structure | One-time | Unlisted |
| Cookie window | Not stated | Not stated |
| Network | Not stated | Direct |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-27 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
In common
- Both are AI agents tools.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a cookie window or a payout threshold.
- TinyFish does not publish a commission rate.
- TinyFish does not publish whether the payout recurs.
- MedReception AI does not publish the platform running the program.
How to read these two records
One of the two does not publish a commission figure, so the payouts cannot be set against each other.
The payout structure is not stated for both programs. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between MedReception AI and TinyFish. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.