Gling vs InVideo affiliate programs
Gling and InVideo are AI video tools that both run affiliate programs. Gling lists 20% for first 12 months through Rewardful; InVideo lists 50% commissions on every monthly plan; 25% commissions on every annual plan through Impact. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Gling Verified | InVideo Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 20% for first 12 months | 50% commissions on every monthly plan; 25% commissions on every annual plan |
| Structure | Recurring | One-time |
| Cookie window | Not stated | 120 days |
| Network | Rewardful | Impact |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-21 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Payout structure differs: recurring against one-time.
- Different platforms: Rewardful against Impact, meaning two dashboards and two payout schedules.
In common
- Both are AI video tools.
What these terms mean in practice
A customer who stays subscribed for two years pays out on every qualifying renewal with Gling, and once with InVideo. Which produces more depends on plan price and retention, neither of which appears in published terms.
Promoting both means two applications, two dashboards, and two payout schedules — Rewardful for Gling and Impact for InVideo, each with its own approval and its own minimum.
Which record fits which promoter
- Gling: suits promoters building income on customer retention — qualifying renewals keep paying after the first sale.
- InVideo: suits single-conversion pushes — one payout per referral regardless of what the customer does later.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a payout threshold.
- Gling does not publish a cookie window.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Gling pays recurring commission and InVideo pays one-time, which typically matters more than the headline rate over a customer's lifetime. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Gling and InVideo. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.