Gling vs HeyGen affiliate programs
Gling and HeyGen are AI video tools that both run affiliate programs. Gling lists 20% for first 12 months through Rewardful; HeyGen lists 35% recurring for 3 months on each subscription driven. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Gling Verified | HeyGen Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 20% for first 12 months | 35% recurring for 3 months on each subscription driven |
| Structure | Recurring | Recurring |
| Cookie window | Not stated | 30 days |
| Network | Rewardful | Not stated |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | $100 |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-21 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
In common
- Both are AI video tools.
- Both pay recurring commission.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Gling does not publish a cookie window.
- Gling does not publish a payout threshold.
- HeyGen does not publish the platform running the program.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Both pay recurring commission. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Gling and HeyGen. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.