Fotor vs Pixlr affiliate programs
Fotor and Pixlr are AI image tools that both run affiliate programs. Fotor lists Up to 60% through ShareASale; Pixlr lists Up to 25% through Awin. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Fotor Verified | Pixlr Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Up to 60% | Up to 25% |
| Structure | One-time | One-time |
| Cookie window | 45 days | Not stated |
| Network | ShareASale | Awin |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | $50 |
| Terms checked | 2026-07-03 | 2026-07-03 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Different platforms: ShareASale against Awin, meaning two dashboards and two payout schedules.
In common
- Both are AI image tools.
- Both pay one-time commission.
What these terms mean in practice
Promoting both means two applications, two dashboards, and two payout schedules — ShareASale for Fotor and Awin for Pixlr, each with its own approval and its own minimum.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Pixlr does not publish a cookie window.
- Fotor does not publish a payout threshold.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Both pay one-time commission. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Fotor and Pixlr. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.