Firecrawl vs Z.ai GLM Coding Plan affiliate programs
Firecrawl and Z.ai GLM Coding Plan are AI code tools that both run affiliate programs. Firecrawl lists 25% of every referred subscription for 12 months, then 15% ongoing through Dub (partners.dub.co); Z.ai GLM Coding Plan lists 10% of each invited friend first-order payment, paid as Z.ai credits (pending until 3 valid invites; +10% tiered bonus per cumulative 30 friends) through Direct. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Firecrawl Verified | Z.ai GLM Coding Plan Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25% of every referred subscription for 12 months, then 15% ongoing | 10% of each invited friend first-order payment, paid as Z.ai credits (pending until 3 valid invites; +10% tiered bonus per cumulative 30 friends) |
| Structure | Recurring | One-time |
| Cookie window | Not stated | Not stated |
| Network | Dub (partners.dub.co) | Direct |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-27 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Payout structure differs: recurring against one-time.
- Different platforms: Dub (partners.dub.co) against Direct, meaning two dashboards and two payout schedules.
In common
- Both are AI code tools.
What these terms mean in practice
A customer who stays subscribed for two years pays out on every qualifying renewal with Firecrawl, and once with Z.ai GLM Coding Plan. Which produces more depends on plan price and retention, neither of which appears in published terms.
Promoting both means two applications, two dashboards, and two payout schedules — Dub (partners.dub.co) for Firecrawl and Direct for Z.ai GLM Coding Plan, each with its own approval and its own minimum.
Which record fits which promoter
- Firecrawl: suits promoters building income on customer retention — qualifying renewals keep paying after the first sale.
- Z.ai GLM Coding Plan: suits single-conversion pushes — one payout per referral regardless of what the customer does later.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a cookie window or a payout threshold.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Firecrawl pays recurring commission and Z.ai GLM Coding Plan pays one-time, which typically matters more than the headline rate over a customer's lifetime. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Firecrawl and Z.ai GLM Coding Plan. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.
Nearby comparisons
All Firecrawl comparisons · All Z.ai GLM Coding Plan comparisons