Context.dev vs Photoroom affiliate programs
Context.dev is an AI code tool and Photoroom is an AI image tool. Both run affiliate programs. Context.dev lists 25% recurring for up to 12 months through Dub; Photoroom lists 20% through Awin. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
These are not alternatives to each other — Context.dev is an AI code tool and Photoroom is an AI image tool. What follows compares their affiliate terms, not the products.
| Recorded term | Context.dev Verified | Photoroom Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25% recurring for up to 12 months | 20% |
| Structure | Recurring | One-time |
| Cookie window | Not stated | 30 days |
| Network | Dub | Awin |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-21 | 2026-07-03 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Different categories: Context.dev is an AI code tool, Photoroom is an AI image tool.
- Payout structure differs: recurring against one-time.
- Different platforms: Dub against Awin, meaning two dashboards and two payout schedules.
What these terms mean in practice
A customer who stays subscribed for two years pays out on every qualifying renewal with Context.dev, and once with Photoroom. Which produces more depends on plan price and retention, neither of which appears in published terms.
Promoting both means two applications, two dashboards, and two payout schedules — Dub for Context.dev and Awin for Photoroom, each with its own approval and its own minimum.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a payout threshold.
- Context.dev does not publish a cookie window.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Context.dev pays recurring commission and Photoroom pays one-time, which typically matters more than the headline rate over a customer's lifetime. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Context.dev and Photoroom. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.