Context.dev vs LLM Gateway affiliate programs
Context.dev and LLM Gateway are AI code tools that both run affiliate programs. Context.dev lists 25% recurring for up to 12 months through Dub; LLM Gateway lists 1% of referred teams' LLM spend (paid as platform credits, non-withdrawable). One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Context.dev Verified | LLM Gateway Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25% recurring for up to 12 months | 1% of referred teams' LLM spend (paid as platform credits, non-withdrawable) |
| Structure | Recurring | Recurring |
| Cookie window | Not stated | Not stated |
| Network | Dub | Not stated |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-21 | 2026-08-22 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
In common
- Both are AI code tools.
- Both pay recurring commission.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a cookie window or a payout threshold.
- LLM Gateway does not publish the platform running the program.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Both pay recurring commission. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Context.dev and LLM Gateway. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.