CodePal vs Context.dev affiliate programs
CodePal and Context.dev are AI code tools that both run affiliate programs. CodePal lists 20% of net eligible subscription revenue through Tolt; Context.dev lists 25% recurring for up to 12 months through Dub. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | CodePal Verified | Context.dev Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 20% of net eligible subscription revenue | 25% recurring for up to 12 months |
| Structure | Unlisted | Recurring |
| Cookie window | 60 days | Not stated |
| Network | Tolt | Dub |
| Payout threshold | Not stated | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-21 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
Differences
- Different platforms: Tolt against Dub, meaning two dashboards and two payout schedules.
In common
- Both are AI code tools.
What these terms mean in practice
Promoting both means two applications, two dashboards, and two payout schedules — Tolt for CodePal and Dub for Context.dev, each with its own approval and its own minimum.
Which record fits which promoter
- CodePal: suits single-conversion pushes — one payout per referral regardless of what the customer does later.
- Context.dev: suits promoters building income on customer retention — qualifying renewals keep paying after the first sale.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Neither vendor publishes a payout threshold.
- CodePal does not publish whether the payout recurs.
- Context.dev does not publish a cookie window.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
The payout structure is not stated for both programs. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between CodePal and Context.dev. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.