Atria vs Blaze affiliate programs
Atria and Blaze are AI marketing tools that both run affiliate programs. Atria lists 25%; Blaze lists 30% for first 2 months, then 15% recurring through FirstPromoter. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared. aifilliate records each program from a cited vendor source and does not rank the two.
| Recorded term | Atria Verified | Blaze Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | 25% | 30% for first 2 months, then 15% recurring |
| Structure | Recurring | Recurring |
| Cookie window | Not stated | 30 days |
| Network | Not stated | FirstPromoter |
| Payout threshold | No minimum threshold | Not stated |
| Terms checked | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-22 |
| Source | Open source ↗ | Open source ↗ |
What matches, what differs
In common
- Both are AI marketing tools.
- Both pay recurring commission.
What is not published
Anything below has to be confirmed with the vendor before either offer can be modelled. aifilliate records it as unknown rather than estimating it.
- Atria does not publish a cookie window.
- Blaze does not publish a payout threshold.
- Atria does not publish the platform running the program.
How to read these two records
Both rates are stated as percentages of customer payments, so the figures share a basis. They may still cover different plans, billing terms, and eligibility rules.
Both pay recurring commission. One of the two does not state a cookie window, so the attribution windows cannot be compared.
aifilliate publishes no ranking between Atria and Blaze. Which program earns more depends on plan price, conversion rate, retention, and refund reversals in your own audience — none of which appear in published affiliate terms. Confirm eligibility, paid-search and trademark rules, and payout timing with each vendor before promoting either.